Two ultra-conservative groups are taking new pot shots at the National Council of Churches USA (NCC).
The Institute on Religion and Democracy, a group funded by Republican aligned organizations, continues their assault on NCC with articles posted on their web site about the group’s meeting last fall in St. Louis. IRD staffer and Bush campaign worker John Lomperis criticizes NCC for not being Republican enough:
On November 8, the day before the Assembly began, nearly two dozen mainline Protestants (and one Orthodox woman) gathered for a day-long “Young Adult Pre-Event.” They were treated to a speech by Catholic columnist Colleen Carroll Campbell, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush and current fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. She spoke on her recent book, The New Faithful: Why Young Adults Are Embracing Christian Orthodoxy.
Campbell is a conservative political operative and writer. Wouldn’t you think Lomperis and IRD would be happy she was invited to speak? Doesn’t this show NCC wants to hear voices across the religious spectrum regardless of politics? Not according to IRD:
It is not clear why council staffers chose Campbell as a speaker. Her presentation was not well received by the audience of young activists selected by NCC denominations. Later in the week, members of that audience repeatedly emphasized that they had little in common with “the new faithful” of whom Campbell spoke. They and the NCC did not show much interest or appreciation for “the new faithful.” Indeed, the council seems to be headed precisely in the opposite direction from the movement described by Campbell. Rather than welcoming the movement as a source of new energy for ecumenism in the coming century, NCC leaders appear determined to drive it away.
NCC gave Campbell a prominent speaking slot at the gathering and promoted her heavily on their web site. Every effort was made to include her voice. Campbell’s failure, as reported by Lomperis, to connect with her audience seems to have been more about her message than anything else. Plenty of religious people reject the politics of division that many associate with the president. Lomperis arrived at the NCC conference fresh from working with the Bush campaign in Ohio. You can bet he would have attacked NCC if they hadn't invited someone like Campell.
Frontpagemag.com is the place you’ll find the second hit piece on NCC this week. No one will be surprised to read they quote from IRD sources in their article. Why are they writing about NCC? They're worried about communists.
Founded in 1950, the New York City-based NCC has, for more than half a century, remained faithful to the legacy of its forerunner, the Communist front-group known as the Federal Council of Churches. At one time an unabashed apostle of the Communist cause, the NCC has today recast itself as a leading representative of the so-called religious Left. Adhering to what it has described as “liberation theology”—that is, Marxist ideology disguised as Christianity—the NCC lays claim to a membership of 36 Protestant, Anglican and Orthodox Christian denominations, and some 50 million members in over 140,000 congregations.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the NCC has soft-pedaled its radical message, dressing up its demands for global collectivization and its rejection of democratic capitalism in the garb of religious teachings. Yet the organization’s history suggests that it was—and remains—a devout backer of a gallery of socialist governments. In the 1950s and 1960s, under cover of charity, the NCC provided financial succor to the Communist regimes in Yugoslavia and Poland, funneling money to both through its relief agency, the Church World Service. In the 1970s, working with its Geneva-based parent organization, the World Council of Churches, the NCC supplied financial support for Soviet-sponsored incursions into Africa, aiding the terrorist rampages of Communist guerillas in Zimbabwe, Namibia, Mozambique, and Angola.
There is no point in responding to such fantasy.
The article blames NCC for a host of world problems, attacks the group for promoting peace, criticizes NCC for financial problems in the mid-1990s, and then criticizes the group for fixing those problems over the last few years.
Further complicating the NCC’s situation is its history of financial mismanagement. Despite doling out hundreds of thousands of dollars in support of various leftist causes, the NCC been saddled with fiscal woes. The NCC’s leadership has long spent beyond the organization’s means, and in 1998, the NCC found itself facing a deficit of $1.5 million….
That has prompted the NCC to turn elsewhere for support. Compensating somewhat for sagging private donations, the NCC has received funding from a handful of left-wing foundations in recent years. In 2000, the NCC took in $100,000 from the Ford Foundation; $149,400 from the Annie E. Casey Foundation in 2000-20001; $150,000 from the Beldon Fund in 2001; $500,000 from the Lilly Endowment in 2002; $50,000 from the Rasmussen Foundation in 2003 and $75,000 from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund that same year.
Who would have thought of these foundations as "left-wing?"
Frontpagemag.com seems to be most frustrated that NCC keeps inferring that God might be concerned about the least of the these, war, and creation.
The NCC’s programmatic opposition to U.S. foreign policy is another manifestation of its deep-rooted leftist politics. Taking refuge in the counsel of the New Testament – “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God” (Matthew 5:9) – the NCC has repeatedly condemned U.S. military interventions. In 1991, the NCC played a central role in The Return of the Peace Movement, a coalition of leftwing religious groups arrayed against the first Gulf war, when American forces repulsed the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. At that time, the leaders of 32 NCC churches announced that the risk of military intervention was “out of proportion to any conceivable gain.”
The NCC’s assessment of the second Gulf War was equally dismissive. In January of 2003, the NCC’s current president, Methodist preacher Bishop Thomas L. Hoyt Jr, joined 46 other religious leaders in signing a letter to President Bush. The letter expressed the signatories’ “continuing uneasiness about the moral justification for war on Iraq,” and suggested that the President accord them the “opportunity to bring this message to you in person.” Citing scheduling conflicts, Mr. Bush, through a spokesman, politely declined. John Kerry, on the other hand, proved a receptive vehicle for the NCC’s pulpit pacifism. During an October 2004 campaign swing through Florida churches, the Democratic candidate, still struggling to stake out a tenable position on the Iraq war, found himself incanting from an NCC-authored list of 10 “Christian principles in an election year.” The first principle held that “war is contrary to the will of God.” In what was arguably the most desperate bid to rally religious opposition to the war, the NCC’s Edgar even took to claiming that the U.S. military intended to massacre Iraqi civilians, declaring that, “The ordinary people in Iraq are going to be the targets of the bombing.” Having failed to thwart U.S. military intervention, the NCC did not reconsider its reflexive opposition to U.S. policy following the fall of the Saddam Hussein regime. Rejecting the notion that America could play the role of a post-war peacemaker, the NCC, in May of 2004, issued yet another letter—which it encouraged member pastors to read to their congregations— urging the U.S. to abdicate authority in Iraq in favor of the United Nations. “We would ask that members of our churches, as they feel appropriate, contact their respective congressional delegations to urge the U.S. to change course in Iraq,” the letter noted.
Even as it has dissociated itself from U.S. foreign policy, the NCC has continuously injected itself into debates on domestic policy. Here, again, the NCC’s strategy involves veiling its leftwing politics in expressions of religious faith. In 2002, the NCC was a party to an environmentalist campaign against the automobile industry. Called “What would Jesus drive?” the campaign, which exhorted car manufactures to embrace stricter emission standards, was engineered by the Evangelical Environmental Network, a coalition of left-leaning religious groups that views “‘environmental’ problems as fundamentally spiritual problems.” The NCC also levied an opposition campaign against the Bush administration’s environmental initiative, the Clean Air Act. In an ad placed in The New York Times, the NCC leadership wrote, “In a spirit of shared faith and respect, we feel called to express grave moral concern about your ‘Clear Skies’ initiative—which we believe is the Administration’s continuous effort to weaken critical environmental standards to protect God’s creation.” Nor was this the first time that the NCC employed such tactics. While proclaiming the virtues of the Kyoto protocol in 1998, the NCC’s then-General Secretary, Rev. Joan Brown Campbell, insisted that an acceptance of the [radical] environmentalist movement’s assertions about global warming ought to be made a “litmus test for the faith community.”
What do these attack articles show? One possibility is that the powers and principalities in control today are worried that religious leaders are regaining their prophetic voice. What happens to the conservative agenda if religious leaders organize a mass movement of Christians to oppose war, poverty and environmental deregulation? Those in charge now would loose power. IRD and Frontpagemag.com don’t want that to happen. After all, IRD gets a lot of their money from Richard Mellon Scaife, Adolph Coors, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation of Milwaukee. These folks really know how to be political (and in the most nasty ways).
I also attended the NCC meeting in St. Louis. Check out these posts to learn more about what really went on:
NCC Holds General Assembly In St. Louis I The Rev. Bob Edgar Visits Eden Theological Seminary I Let Just Roll Campaign Will Keep Rolling On I St. Louis Professor Receives National Recognition For His Work To Bring Churches Together I Eden Theological Seminary Students Recognized At NCC Dinner
Recent Comments